1.
SCRIPT
1.1.
Reality
Expected outcomes
· Discussion on site context.
· Discussion on needs and social relevance.
· Discussion on future trends.
· Diagrams and/or collages to present outcomes of
discussions.
· Sense of reality in your Architecture Fiction.
Due to the site, there were many
possibilities and thus fitting in with my concept of being cut off a
self-sustainable ‘village’ seemed a viable option. The needs of the ‘village’
would be that off crops for food and clothing as well as a water source. The
surrounding woodland also provides a great source of building materials and
it is suggested that sustainable harvesting be implemented so that certain
parts of woodfordia are harvested then cared for while another part is
harvested. It is hoped that by using this system the resources on the site
are not exhausted rather utilised. It is hoped that as systems are recreated
life will go back to a way that has a semblance of normal and eventually when
the land has recovered from the nuclear destruction many years later life
will go back to how it is at the moment. Due to all the media attention
Syria’s biological weapons attack(2013) and Saddam Hussein have had there
have been many conspiracy theories about the weapons that each country
secretly has. It is possible that these theories as well as issues such as
North Korea wanting to attack America and other dramas within the countries
eventually leads to war and that the countries are reduced to using nuclear
weapons as losing becomes an unbearable option.
|
1.2.
Creativity
Expected Outcomes
· Exploration of future possibilities.
· Exploration and identification of possible beneficiaries
of your proposal.
· Snippets of general future scenarios.
· Creatively narrated and composed Architecture Fiction that
includes "STAGE" and "SCENES" outcomes.
Some
future realistic possibilities include that of self-sustainable communities
having to learn to live off of the land. Some benefits of my proposal will
include that off being able to confortable support a community that would
otherwise struggle to survive after the events leading up the nuclear war.
Another scenario could be that off little communities joining forces and
certain communities being responsible for different resources and a system of
bartering occurring within the communities. The stage becomes woodfordia and
the surrounding woods while the scenes involve that of how the community
would develop and work over time in a sustainable fashion in order to keep
the community going.
|
2.
STAGE
2.1.
Purpose
Expected Outcomes
· Exploration of appropriate architectural responses, such
as scale, spatial requirements, facilities and logistic requirements.
· Physical models to help your explorations.
· Diagrams that demonstrate outcomes of your explorations.
· 1:1000 - 1:5000 site plan with your design that shows
relationship to adjacent areas.
· 1:100 - 1:500 elevation and section of your proposal in
site context.
· Physical model that shows your proposal in context.
A 3D model was created in revit to help visualise and help to demonstrate how the building was to fit into the surroundings as well as how it would fit the clients needs. Residences, storage, a meeting hall as well as spare rooms for classes, functions and meetings were provided in order to fit the residences needs. |
2.2.
Navigation
Expected Outcomes
· Exploration of spatial relationships, how they function
together, how do people navigate through spaces, etc.
· Plans, Sections, and/or Diagrams showing how people enter
site and first available space(s).
· Plans, Sections, and/or Diagrams showing how people
typically navigate through spaces and use them.
· Plans, Sections, and/or Diagrams showing how
private/semi-private/public spaces are defined in your proposal.
The circulation space through the levels is at the end of the building as this space does not feature much natural lighting or ventilation. The plant room was situated beside this space due to reticulation of services as well as the lack of natural lighting and ventilation. The residences are situated on the outside of the building due to the large quantities of natural lighting and ventilation, this was considered to be desirable for the residences. The storage was situated on the inside of the building in the middle of the residences for convenience as well the lack of natural lighting and ventilation as this is not required for this space. |
2.3.
Integrity
Expected Outcomes
·
Exploration of forms, structures,
materials and services for your proposal.
·
Plans, Sections and Elevations
(1:100 - 1:200) that demonstrate overall form and structure of your proposal.
·
Plans, Sections and/or 3D drawing
(1:10 - 1:50) that shows vignettes/snippets of key architectural details and
material uses in your proposal.
·
Physical Models that shows forms,
structural integrity and/or material.
A number of varying forms were investigated until the initial form emerged and became the proposal.
|
3.
SCENES
3.1.
Presence
& Identity
Expected Outcomes
· Exploration and identification of a unique architectural
identity of your proposal.
· Name (and possibly a nickname) of your building.
· Three Dimensional renderings and/or collages of your
proposal in context.
· Scenes that communicate how people come to your proposed
spaces and why.
Casa Segura which is spanish for safe zone was named so due to it becoming one of the few safe zones upon which people are still able to live after the nuclear war. |
3.2.
First-Person
Experience
Expected Outcomes
· Exploration and identification of a set of key spaces that
characterises and makes your proposal known by people in your future
scenario.
· A sequence of internal 3D renderings and collages that
show how key spaces are used by selected audience in your scenario.
· A sequence of internal and external renderings, collages,
and/or physical models that shows experiential and atmospheric quality of the
key spaces.
I am working on a number of images demonstrating the interior spaces and how the residents interact with the spaces.
|










